Book Review: Introduction to Quantum Mechanics by David J. Griffiths

Introduction to Quantum MechanicsIntroduction to Quantum Mechanics by David J. Griffiths

My rating: 2 of 5 stars (“It was ok.”)

First, the good: this book doesn’t require mastery of “advanced” classical physics and math such as Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics, electromagnetism, partial differential equations, linear algebra, or statistics. For example, Griffiths takes his time to explain standard deviations, separation of variables, and phase and group velocity in the beginning. This makes the book very accessible.

The bad: While a step by step calculation makes it easy to follow, one often gets lost in details and misses the big picture. This is not helped by the fact that the book shies away from the math of QM: linear algebra and the concise Dirac notation, which is introduced but quickly discarded.

The author takes the shut-up-and-calculate approach to the extreme (like how standard freshman physics textbooks present QM). The formalism is not developed logically, and, overall, the book is very weak in formalism. For example, the Schrödinger equation specialized to the position space is given from the get-go with the motivation that it is the quantum equivalence of Newton’s equation of motion, which is true, but not really helpful; a child may be familiar with the notion of forces, but not Hamiltonians and complex amplitudes. The many subtleties of postulates are never spelled out. (Compare this to e.g. chapter 4 of Shankar’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics (Hardcover))

An important fact that quantum states (and not wave functions) and operators in Hilbert space are geometric objects that do not depend on a particular representation is not emphasized enough; there should be more discussion on manipulation of abstract operators e.g. proving algebraic properties of Pauli operators. Operator exponentials, and unitary and symmetry operations only make a brief appearance as 2 and 3-star end-chapter problems (which, according to the author’s rating scheme, are difficult or peripheral problems). The treatment of finite-dimensional systems could be much clearer if armed with these tools.

I used this book for an undergraduate course taught by an excellent professor. (He made up all the problem sets. So I can’t judge the quality of problems in Griffiths.) And I had learned Dirac notation by myself beforehand (from Sakurai’s Modern Quantum Mechanics). Otherwise, I think that my experience would have been disastrous. I can recommend it to an absolute beginner, but with the caveat that this cannot be your last QM book if you want to understand QM. Griffiths prepares you in wave mechanics for e.g. spectroscopy and scattering calculations, but for the foundations of QM, look elsewhere. (A very nice second book explicitly aiming to clear up the conceptual understanding of those who just finish this kind of “wave mechanics” course is Isham’s Lectures on Quantum Theory: Mathematical and Structural Foundations.)

For alternatives, I recommend Schumacher and Westmoreland’s Quantum Processes, Systems, and Information for modern concepts and Zettili’s Quantum Mechanics: Concepts and Applications for worked problems. Shankar and Sakurai mentioned in this review are also excellent.

View all my reviews

Advertisements

About Ninnat Dangniam

นักเรียน, นักเขียน, นักวาด
This entry was posted in Quantum. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s